Posts Tagged ‘get out the way’
I haven’t blogged in any great depth about Scrmblr (’scrambler’), so thought it was about time.
Scrmblr is a global network of content producers (Scrmblrs) who create anti-ads (Scrmbls).
Marketing used to be about advertising, but advertising is often expensive, fake and dumb. What remains important is the act of telling stories about the things we trade – stories that sell and stories that spread.
Scrmblr gives power to the people – the talented people of the world, enabling creators of great content to reap fair rewards, while enabling organisations who couldn’t dream of affording video ads the opportunity to air Scrmbls (much better!). Cheaper, better, faster.
Scrmblr removes the unfair, prohibitive supply-chain mess that sits between talented people who make stuff and people who buy great stuff.
Fair trade.
The Scrmblr website has just been launched here. 20% of profits will be donated to microcredit projects, in a drive to do something good. The first scrmbl created was for UK charity ShelterBox, by Tel Aviv scrmblr Danny Aronson.
Scrmblr already has a presence in UK, ISA, Israel and Canada… and is on the lookout for more talent (filmmakers, producers, animators, designers, creatives etc).

Let’s compare for a moment. You can compare in terms of pretty much anything: efficiency, effectiveness, happiness…
Some brief examples:
Communications
C: Spread from the top down
T: Spread from anywhere to everywhere, via the centre
Growth
C: Recruit from the top, hiring below
T: Recruit from anywhere, hiring everywhere
Innovation
C: Creation from the bottom, managed from the top
T: Creation from everywhere, no management needed
Bliss
C: Everyone spends their time inside the company’s expensive box, developing ideas with others from the same company
T: Everyone works from anywhere, developing ideas with a diverse range of people they like to spend time with
I know which one I’d rather join, or start.
Michael Rosenblum’s recent post on conventional media companies is worth blogging in full, so here it is:

They are the walking dead.
Conventional media companies, that is.
They are already dead, they just don’t know it.
“I’m still alive” they say.
Tear off an arm… or fire 30% of your editorial staff… but they keep coming at you.
“See. I’m still alive!”
Rip off another arm….
“still alive”, despite the blood all over the floor.
They are dead.
Newspapers. TV networks.
The undead.
It’s just that no one has told them yet.
They are on life support. They keep cutting their journalism staffs, keep reducing the content in the peculiar hope that this, somehow, will keep them alive just one more day. Or they take to ‘aggregating’ – eating the brains of others.
It doesn’t mean that journalism is dead. Far from it. But the conventional instutions clearly are.
And it doesn’t mean that there isn’t an appetite for quality reporting and information. That’s stil there too. What no longer works is their architecture, their overhead, their fixed costs. They have a lot of stuff that is killing them that they don’t need, like buildings, or a lot of management, or TV news crews. So what do you do?
You have to shoot them in the head.
It’s the only thing that works.
You have to free the journalists to do what they do and to connect directly with their audiences, and you have to spend the income that you do get on the content, not the building or the bloated management or the totally unnecessary technical staff.
—
Hell yeah. Get out of the way! Enable journalists to connect directly with audiences, authors to connect directly with readers, musicians to connect directly with fans… same, same, same.
A few words on the publishing industry, inspired Alan Rusbridger’s [Editor in Chief, Guardian Media] recent comment that “These are the last printing presses we’ll ever buy”; and by an email I just received which included the quote “I would never read a book if I could talk half an hour with the person who wrote it”.
Decline factors…
- Inefficient many‐to‐many supply chain = high levels of wastage
- Risk adverse publishers hamper the emergence of new authors
- Entry to distribution channels is a fundamental barrier to new publishers setting up
- Market data isn’t successfully harnessed to allow better decision making on which titles to produce
- Publishers place more emphasis on fulfilling orders than on understanding customer needs
- ICT adoption is only as fast as the slowest adopter in the supply chain, so uneven skills levels between companies hampers innovation
Given that individuals now have the power to organise without organisations, it’s time to get out of the way and enable readers and authors to interact. We need to strip away copyright hang-ups and enter into the Web 2.0 spirit of sharing and co-creation (it’s going to happen whether those with the sand slipping between their fingers like it or not, so everyone might as well admit it and leverage all things ‘free’ in lucrative new business models instead of clutching at straws while they die a slow death). While we’re at it, how’s about stripping away all the supply chain complexity and providing tools and environments where authors and readers can communicate directly; and gain all the benefits of doing so in a mutual value exchange.
Publishing, music, film… very similar problems, very similar solutions. Armies of fanatics aplenty. Massive opportunities.
Check out The Music Industry Manifesto for a good dose of common sense.
Reading is a means of learning, self‐educating, exploring and broadening horizons. Ultimately, it’s all about DISCOVERY. Think for a sec how we’d advance loads of fundamental human endeavors if we stopped putting up barriers to discovery, for misguided (non)commercial gains.
If discovery is the action, the state required to achieve it is RESONANCE.
Recent Comments