Woohoo! Scramblr has been selected as a finalist in Mini Seedcamp London!
Sign-ups on the Scramblr site are going mental, probably due to Techcrunch giving us a mention here and Seedcamp’s blog mentioning us here.
Roll on the 27th! Can’t wait
Thanks to everyone who shared, liked, commented on and favourited my slideshare presentation Complexity and Humanity 2.0; and for all the lovely messages.
I’ve made a video out of the deck and I’m entering it into Slideshare’s video of the week contest.
If you like it please vote for me by retweeting this link (or sharing it on facebook): http://slidesha.re/aiNZFk
Thanks!
Over 3 billion years ago, a remarkable accident occurred…
Molecules were created that could make copies of themselves.
Not that surprisingly really – probability-wise – given the zillions and squillions of instances of stuff swooshing around and colliding.
Essentially the earth’s first replicator was born. As Eric D. Beinhocker said in The Origin of Wealth, GOOD REPLICATORS GET REPLICATED. This is a thought worth pondering for a very long time. The implications are huge.
This golden rule was basically the point of Richard Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene [1976], in which he explored how genes will get copied if they can, regardless of the consequences; and so long as you have variation, selection and heredity, you must get evolution, or ‘design out of chaos without the aid of mind’ (Dan Dennett). This is basic circular logic.
The really interesting thing that happened next was the birth of the second replicator on earth…
Us.
We humans copy information, or ‘memes’, from person to person, brain to brain. There’s variation and selection… it’s basically a design process. Just like genes, if memes can get copied they will – from hand gestures, to wearing earrings, to language, to toilets, to education. We’re all essentially propagating copying machines.
The thing is, we don’t just copy useful, beautiful, true things. That’s part of the reason our brains have grown so large. Rather than staying economical, concerned only with lighting fires, hunting, breeding; our brain capacity is extended to encompass other things, like Britney Spears, sudoku and advertising. In fact our brains have become mighty strange, hijacked by parasitic ideas, like religion (and like most parasites, we end up with a symbiotic relationship). Just as it isn’t our fault when our germs harm others who haven’t developed an immunity, we can’t be blamed for effectively wiping out others’ traditions by spreading our memes; and we can’t be surprised when those who aren’t immune to things we’re used to are very freaked out as a result.
This is something to bear in mind as we spread our teachings and technologies. Likewise, we should be aware of the evolution of technology and its parallels with genetics and mimetics. Good replicators get replicated; and the ‘fit’ is determined by the environment. So just as plants producing oxygen led to oxygen breathers like us prospering; you could say that we’re essentially destroying our current environment to make way for computers.
That may sound a little dramatic, but it’s worth considering whether the ‘fact’ that we invented the internet and other technologies is really true. Didn’t the internet evolve as a result of mimetics, i.e. the copying of cultural ideas from brain to brain over a period of time, whereby the best replicators get replicated?
At the same time, we can see how humans are evolving via technology. For example, before we could read and write, our memories performed much better. Nowadays that’s exacerbated by Google-mentality, skimming and quick kicks. We’re getting very good at developing technologies that remove functions from humans.
So what?
Well, the really interesting thought in all this is that we might be entering the era of the earth’s third replicator. In order to get what Susan Blackmore calls ‘temes’ (technological memes), you need the variation, the selection, the copying, all done outside of humans. Of course we’re starting to see that happen.
So maybe we didn’t create the internet for our own benefit. Maybe we’ve been looking at it all the wrong way. Instead, consider that ‘temes’ spread because they must. Just like the selfish gene.
If teme machines replicate, it won’t matter if the planet is unstable. They can thrive without us.
We are the old machines.
The word ‘agility’ is being bandied about a lot lately. Agile development processes are the norm in tech companies now – favoured over the old school linear (waterfall) method, for obvious reasons, like more rapid development and alignment with customer need.
It stands to reason we can no longer risk the time and money wrapped up in locking ourselves in a room, devising and developing, then unleashing on the world in the hope they like what we’re group-thunk. Instead we iterate, evolve, collaborate, release little and often and pursue a path of perpetual beta.
The thing is, agility doesn’t just apply to product development and business process. Agility applies to life as an individual too.
Consider agility in terms of education… locking yourself away in scheduled lessons for fifteen years, only to be unleashed on the world with a bunch of largely irrelevant skills and skewed expectations; versus learning little and often, applying it, veering in a direction that’s a better fit, tweaking, collaborating and remaining in a mindstate of perpetual beta / lifelong learning.
The insecurity experienced by those who’ve debted up to the nines on the pathway to release in the real world, without means of first validating demand by listening and iterating to suit, is causing a nationwide upsurge in lost souls.
Get something – product / self – out there now. Don’t wait for perfection or completion – there’s no such thing. There’s only assumption. And we all know what that’s the mother of.
It was interesting today that I overheard a young sales exec who’s just starting to learn the ropes talking with her boss. Having shown a keenness to gain more proficiency in sales, I listened as she asked whether she could do a sales course.
Intuitively, the product of a successful linear education sees the step before ‘doing’ as ‘being taught’.
She asked for my advice on courses. I said, ‘if you want to learn something, Google it. Then do it.’
That’s it.
The thing is, more new information will be generated worldwide this year than in the previous 5,000 years. Right now the amount of new technical information is doubling every two years. This means half of what students learn in their first year will be outdated by their third.
Now more than ever it’s important not to use linear education as a magic (and perpetually disappointing, of course) crutch to prop you up when you’re faced with doing. Infinite sources of learning are instantly available to anyone with an internet connection. Free tools of discovery are everyday.
The journey of discovery off your own bat is as valuable and unexpectedly revealing as the output you desired when you started searching.
Never underestimate the effectiveness of a Google education. The ability to learn what you should listen to versus the abundance of crap you should cast aside is the new recital.
Here’s the second in the series. Rory Sutherland talking about advertising and human behaviour. Rory covers some of the points I was getting at in this presentation on Complexity & Humanity 2.0.
Rory Sutherland on… Advertising & Human Behaviour from Jane Young on Vimeo.
Recent Comments